ArticleJournal of dentistry2026
Antibiotics after non-surgical root canals: National Dental Practice-Based Research Network findings.
Article in Journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite guideline recommendations discouraging routine antibiotic use for localized endodontic infections, antibiotics continue to be prescribed after non-surgical root canal therapy (RCT). This study evaluated antibiotic prescribing patterns among general dentists and endodontists across a range of practice settings in the United States National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
methodsA total of 153 dentists enrolled 1,723 patients requiring RCT. Dentists collected clinical, radiographic, and demographic data. The primary outcome was whether systemic antibiotics were prescribed after treatment. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess associations between antibiotic prescribing patterns and dentist, patient, and clinical characteristics. A secondary analysis was restricted to teeth with vital pulp and no swelling-clinical situations where antibiotics are not indicated.
resultsAntibiotics were prescribed to 322 (19%) patients. In adjusted models, patients with teeth with tenderness to palpation (OR=1.40; p=.046) or apical periodontitis (OR=1.56; p=.004) were more likely to receive antibiotics. Dentists younger than 45 years (OR=0.47; p=.02), non-Hispanic White (OR=0.40; p=.01), and those affiliated with large group or academic practices (OR=0.25; p=.007) were significantly less likely to prescribe antibiotics. Patients with only a high school education or racial-ethnic minority backgrounds were more frequently prescribed antibiotics (p<.05).
conclusionsNearly one in five patients undergoing RCT were prescribed antibiotics, often without clear clinical indications. Prescribing varied by dentist, patient, and clinical characteristics. These findings highlight persistent gaps between guideline-based recommendations and real-world practice, underscoring the need for targeted antibiotic stewardship interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.