Observational studyThe Journal of surgical research2026
Opioid Risk Tool Scores are Not Associated With Opioid Misuse After Elective General Surgery: A Prospective Study.
Observational study in The Journal of surgical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAssessment for opioid misuse is not widely utilized preoperatively. Yet, it can offer valuable clinical insight for patient counseling. The opioid risk tool (ORT) and its opioid use disorder-specific variant (ORT-OUD) predict opioid misuse in chronic pain patients. Although recommended for surgical patients, neither has been validated. Herein, we sought to validate the ORT and ORT-OUD in patients undergoing elective general surgery procedures.
methodsThis was a prospective observational study. Consented patients filled out the ORT. Demographics, prescribed opioids, and adjuncts were collected. Pain control ratings after surgery and whether patients were still using opioids were collected at 30 days post surgery. Patients were grouped as low, medium, and high-risk for opioid misuse based on ORT or ORT-OUD scores and compared. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsWe included 178 patients; 139, 28, and 11 scored low, medium, and high-risk on the ORT, respectively. Compared to low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk patients were more likely to call for pain (8% versus 32.1% versus 36.4%; P < 0.001) and rate their pain control as poor or fair (8.5% versus 25% versus 18.2%; P = 0.047). Only three opioid-naïve patients were still using opioids 30 days post surgery; they all scored low-risk on ORT. Similar results were obtained with the ORT-OUD.
conclusionsAlthough higher ORT scores are associated with worse pain satisfaction and an increased likelihood of a phone call for pain, the ORT and ORT-OUD were not validated as predictive tools for prolonged opioid use or opioid misuse following elective general surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.