Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42419059›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2026

Guiding Principles of Integrated Cancer Care Delivery Within a Regional Health System.

Christina M Fleischer, Sarah E Bradley, Ashley N Garrity, Scott E Regenbogen, Justin B Dimick, Lesly A Dossett, Calista M Harbaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christina M FleischerDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: fleiscch@med.umich.edu.
Sarah E BradleyUniversity of Michigan, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ashley N GarrityUniversity of Michigan, Michigan Program on Value Enhancement (MPrOVE), Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Scott E RegenbogenDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Justin B DimickDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lesly A DossettDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan, Michigan Program on Value Enhancement (MPrOVE), Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Calista M HarbaughDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training Center in Cancer Care DeliveryT32CA236621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lauren P Wallner · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUS hospital consolidation has been driven primarily by economic advantages, rather than by efforts to improve regional clinical care delivery. Health systems are secondarily redesigning delivery models but have little guidance on how to integrate care across an expanded footprint. We sought to understand how hospital leaders at a quaternary academic health system approach care delivery integration.

methodsWe conducted 12 semistructured interviews with hospital-level quality, operations, strategy, and patient engagement leaders in a Midwestern regional health system. Interviews explored perceptions of current integration strategy and the key features of an integrated health system to inform future organizational structure. Interviews focused on colorectal cancer, as it is multidisciplinary, longitudinal, and a common cancer with a range of complexities and well-defined care guidelines. A hybrid inductive and deductive thematic approach was used to analyze interview data.

resultsHealth system leaders described aspects of ideal regional cancer care, which were categorized into four primary themes and associated subthemes: (1) ensuring consistent, high-quality, evidence-based care across all entities within the system; (2) optimizing site of care delivery for effective regional triage; (3) leveraging technology for care coordination; and (4) fostering provider engagement and cultural unity.

conclusionsThe four themes identified in this study form a proposed framework that may guide colorectal cancer care integration across a regional health system and enable improvements in clinical care coordination. Beyond a clinical, operational, and financial focus, these principles highlight the importance of developing cultural unity as a key component of successful integration.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedRegional Medical ProgramsHumansInterviews as TopicColorectal cancerHospital consolidationHospital leadershipIntegrated careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42419059
PMCPMC13380080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.