ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Management of cytomegalovirus reactivation and immunosuppression following uterus transplantation.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) is an emerging therapeutic option for women with absolute uterine factor infertility, requiring intensive immunosuppression that increases susceptibility to opportunistic infections such as cytomegalovirus (CMV). Evidence guiding CMV management in UTx remains limited. The authors report a case of CMV reactivation in a 34-year-old woman with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome who underwent successful living-donor UTx. The patient received induction with methylprednisolone and basiliximab, followed by maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, azathioprine, and prednisone. Antiviral prophylaxis with ganciclovir/valganciclovir was administered for three months. After prophylaxis discontinuation, routine surveillance detected CMV DNAemia approximately five months post-transplant, leading to treatment with valganciclovir and temporary postponement of embryo transfer. Following viral clearance, embryo transfer was successfully performed. During early pregnancy, low-level CMV DNAemia recurred. Given concerns about antiviral teratogenicity, management focused on the reduction of immunosuppression, including tacrolimus dose adjustment and discontinuation of azathioprine, with close monitoring via cervical biopsies. CMV DNAemia resolved spontaneously without antiviral therapy, and no rejection episodes or CMV disease occurred. This case highlights the complex balance between infection control and graft preservation in UTx recipients, particularly during pregnancy. It suggests that individualized reduction of immunosuppression may be a safe and effective strategy for managing CMV reactivation when antiviral therapy is contraindicated. Additionally, it supports the concept that the uterine graft may exhibit relatively low immunogenicity. Further studies are needed to define optimal immunosuppressive thresholds and standardized CMV management protocols in this unique transplant population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.