ArticleThe British journal of surgery2026
Patient-reported outcomes in masculinizing gender-affirming chest surgery: validation of the GENDER-Q Chest scales.
Article in The British journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMasculinizing gender-affirming chest surgery is the most frequently accessed type of gender-affirming procedure. The GENDER-Q Chest scales were developed to better assess patient-reported outcomes in masculinizing gender-affirming chest surgery, yet previous psychometric assessment of these scales is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the construct validity of the GENDER-Q Chest scales (Chest, Nipples & Areolas, and Scars).
methodsAn international, cross-sectional study was performed to develop the GENDER-Q between February 2022 and March 2024. Individuals were included in this analysis if they had sought or received masculinizing gender-affirming chest surgery and completed the GENDER-Q Chest scale. Construct validity was assessed for each scale by testing a priori hypotheses. According to Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidelines, at least 75% acceptance of hypotheses indicates sufficient evidence of construct validity.
resultsA total of 2846 participants completed the GENDER-Q Chest scale. For the GENDER-Q Chest, Nipples & Areolas, and Scars scales, 95% (21 of 22), 79% (15 of 19), and 100% (12 of 12) of hypotheses were accepted for each scale respectively. Patients who had undergone surgery and did not need revisions at survey completion reported the highest satisfaction, while patients who had not yet undergone surgery reported the lowest satisfaction.
conclusionThe GENDER-Q Chest scales evidenced construct validity to measure appearance of chest, nipples and areolas, and scars for individuals seeking or undergoing masculinizing gender-affirming chest surgery. The GENDER-Q Chest scales provide a robust, validated approach for assessing outcomes in this context and are well suited for generating high-quality evidence on patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.