Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418770›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2026

Protein turnover in plants-cost of synthesis, repair, and crop engineering opportunities.

Anastasia J I Högerl, Sudarshan Gnanamani, Ulschan Bathe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anastasia J I HögerlBiotechnology of Horticultural Crops, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Straße 1, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-4503-7753
Sudarshan GnanamaniBiotechnology of Horticultural Crops, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Straße 1, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-0888-2357
Ulschan BatheBiotechnology of Horticultural Crops, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Straße 1, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0454-502X

Funding

Elite Network BavariaThe Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein lifespan is shaped by plant developmental stage and cellular requirements; both are fairly well understood processes. Beyond regulated degradation, chemical damage is another major cause of protein turnover, yet it is an understudied area in plant biology and crop engineering. The associated respiratory costs limit harvestable crop yield because the degradation and resynthesis of inactivated proteins consume carbon that then cannot be used for biomass production. Approximately half of the carbon fixed by plants is lost through respiration; of that, protein turnover consists of ∼25% to ∼40%. In this review, we examine the importance of spontaneous protein modifications arising under both optimal and environmental stress conditions; the latter can elevate protein turnover costs, negatively impacting crop yield. While homeostasis of most proteins following damage is likely maintained via de novo synthesis, some molecular mechanisms exist in cells to prevent and repair protein damage. They offer a substantial energetic advantage over resynthesis. We illustrate these benefits with specific examples and quantify their associated costs. Finally, understanding the causes, energetic consequences, and repair mechanisms of protein damage can inform strategies to improve crop performance. We suggest potential protein targets and synthetic biology approaches to be exploited for future crop engineering.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPlant ProteinsPlantsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42418770
PMCPMC13591397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.