ReviewPlant physiology2026
Protein turnover in plants-cost of synthesis, repair, and crop engineering opportunities.
Review in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein lifespan is shaped by plant developmental stage and cellular requirements; both are fairly well understood processes. Beyond regulated degradation, chemical damage is another major cause of protein turnover, yet it is an understudied area in plant biology and crop engineering. The associated respiratory costs limit harvestable crop yield because the degradation and resynthesis of inactivated proteins consume carbon that then cannot be used for biomass production. Approximately half of the carbon fixed by plants is lost through respiration; of that, protein turnover consists of ∼25% to ∼40%. In this review, we examine the importance of spontaneous protein modifications arising under both optimal and environmental stress conditions; the latter can elevate protein turnover costs, negatively impacting crop yield. While homeostasis of most proteins following damage is likely maintained via de novo synthesis, some molecular mechanisms exist in cells to prevent and repair protein damage. They offer a substantial energetic advantage over resynthesis. We illustrate these benefits with specific examples and quantify their associated costs. Finally, understanding the causes, energetic consequences, and repair mechanisms of protein damage can inform strategies to improve crop performance. We suggest potential protein targets and synthetic biology approaches to be exploited for future crop engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.