Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418768›Full record

ReviewJMIR diabetes2026

AI-Based Models for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment: Scoping Review.

Muhamad Zulfiqar, Saldy Yusuf, Muhammad Jufri Taming, Herlina Burhan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhamad ZulfiqarFaculty of Nursing, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM 10, Makassar, South Sulawesi, 90245, Indonesia, 62 81241841800.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1925-5443
Saldy YusufFaculty of Nursing, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM 10, Makassar, South Sulawesi, 90245, Indonesia, 62 81241841800.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5993-9325
Muhammad Jufri TamingFaculty of Nursing, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM 10, Makassar, South Sulawesi, 90245, Indonesia, 62 81241841800.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7770-0491
Herlina BurhanFaculty of Nursing, Hasanuddin University, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM 10, Makassar, South Sulawesi, 90245, Indonesia, 62 81241841800.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4766-7265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are serious complications of diabetes that contribute substantially to morbidity, mortality, and health care burden. Accurate and timely wound assessment is essential for effective DFU management; however, conventional assessment methods are limited by subjectivity, time constraints, and interobserver variability. Objective: This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize evidence regarding the development and application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models for DFU assessment. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus for studies published between 2014 and 2026. Study selection and data charting were conducted independently by two reviewers using predefined inclusion criteria based on the PCC (population, concept, context) framework. Extracted data were synthesized narratively and categorized according to major AI application domains. Results: A total of 654 records were identified, of which 46 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies predominantly focused on image segmentation, diagnostic classification, and risk prediction or monitoring of DFUs. Convolutional neural networks were the most commonly applied models, with performance evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, Dice similarity coefficient, and area under the curve. Most studies relied on retrospective, single-center datasets, with limited external validation and minimal real-world clinical implementation. Conclusions: AI-based models demonstrate strong potential to enhance DFU assessment and monitoring by improving accuracy and efficiency. However, significant gaps remain in terms of dataset diversity, external validation, and integration into clinical workflows. Future research should prioritize prospective validation, standardized datasets, and real-world implementation to support safe and effective clinical adoption.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdiabetic foot ulcersdiabetic woundscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42418768
PMCPMC13345344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.