ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2026
Atrial Fibrosis Imaging: Correlation of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging With High-Definition Voltage Electroanatomical Mapping Across Different Thresholds.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAtrial fibrosis is an adverse factor for arrhythmia recurrences and thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRi) has emerged as a noninvasive tool for its assessment, though evidence remains conflicting. METHODS AND
resultsSixty ablation-naïve patients with AF scheduled for first-time catheter ablation were enrolled (78% men, 67% paroxysmal AF, 73% heart failure reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). Prior to the procedure, CMRi was performed in sinus rhythm (SR) on a 1.5T system using a high-resolution (1.3 mm isotropic) free-breathing 3D LGE sequence with echo-navigator end-expiratory gating and whole-heart coverage. Left atrium (LA) fibrosis was quantified using the commercially available ADAS 3D software, with fibrosis defined at four image intensity ratios (IIR) thresholds (0.97, 1.2, 1.32, and 1.61 times mean blood-pool signal intensity). High-density electroanatomical mapping (EAM) was performed in SR, and low-voltage substrates (LVS) were quantified at three bipolar voltage thresholds (0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 mV). LVS-EAM were identified in 97%, 88%, and 45% of patients at 0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 mV, respectively. LGE-CMRi was detected in 100%, 97%, 63%, and 17% of patients at IIR thresholds of 0.97, 1.2, 1.32, and 1.61, respectively. Quantitative correlation between CMR- and EAM-derived fibrosis was negligible to weak across all threshold combinations. When fibrosis was analyzed dichotomously, agreement was highest between EAM 0.5 mV and CMR IIR 0.97 (0.97, 95% CI [0.92, 1.00]; p < 0.001) and IIR 1.2 (1, 95% CI [1.00, 1.00]; p < 0.001), and between EAM 0.25 mV and CMR IIR 0.97 (0.87 95% CI [0.76, 0.97]; p < 0.001) and IIR 1.2 (0.9, 95% CI [0.81, 0.99]; p < 0.001).
conclusionsIn an ablation-naïve AF population with a predominance of HFrEF patients, CMR- and EAM-derived measures of atrial fibrosis showed poor quantitative correlation across multiple threshold combinations. Although agreement improved when fibrosis was analyzed dichotomously (presence vs. absence of fibrosis), the highest agreement was observed at the most sensitive threshold combinations. The findings of our study highlight the need for standardized, validated, and reproducible CMR protocols for native atrial fibrosis assessment in order to provide a noninvasive alternative to EAM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.