ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
Implicit Bias and Microaggressions in the Care of People With Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness: Bridging Medicine, Disability Studies, and Family Advocacy.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProlonged Disorders of Consciousness (PDOC), including unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state, present persistent challenges in clinical assessment and long-term care. Although behavioral observation remains the primary basis for detecting signs of consciousness, interpretation of such observations often depends on clinical judgment and contextual information provided by caregivers. In some cases, family caregivers may detect subtle signs of recovery in individuals with PDOC; however, these observations are not always incorporated into clinical assessment or diagnostic interpretation due to the inherent ambiguity of behavioral responses. AIM AND
methodThis study explores how implicit biases and microaggressions may influence the interpretation of caregiver observations in PDOC care. Furthermore, it introduces a conceptual framework-the Context-Dependent Diagnostic Sensitivity Model-to illustrate how clinical awareness of bias and improved communication with families may contribute to more accurate diagnostic interpretation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven family caregivers of individuals with PDOC living in home healthcare settings in Japan. Using thematic analysis, the study examined caregivers' experiences of communication and interaction with healthcare professionals.
findingsCaregivers frequently reported situations in which their interpretations of patient responses were minimized or reframed as unrealistic expectations. Such interactions sometimes limited the incorporation of caregiver observations into clinical assessment and decision-making processes. These findings suggest that subtle forms of bias embedded in professional communication may influence opportunities for behavioral observation and family participation in care.
conclusionBy integrating qualitative findings with insights from disability studies and research on implicit bias, this study highlights the potential impact of microaggressions on diagnostic sensitivity and clinical interaction in PDOC care. Recognizing and addressing these dynamics may contribute to improved collaboration between healthcare professionals and family caregivers, as well as to the development of more effective clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.