ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Machine learning decision tree models for multiclass classification of prognosis in patient undergoing palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate estimation of prognosis and life expectancy is essential in patients with advanced cancer, as it guides clinical decision-making and helps avoid unnecessary interventions while facilitating timely integration of palliative and supportive care. Palliative radiotherapy plays a key role within multidisciplinary management, offering effective and well-tolerated symptom relief for complications such as pain, bleeding, and obstruction, with treatment strategies closely tailored to expected survival. Although recent advances in machine learning have improved prognostic accuracy by modeling complex variable interactions, their application in palliative care settings remains limited. PURPOSE: To aid clinical decision-making, we developed a decision tree multi-classifier to predict the mortality at 3, 24, and 52 weeks following palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases.
methodsData from 573 adults diagnosed with metastatic cancer were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) defined as the number of months from treatment to death event. Four clinically relevant classes were defined: Class 0 (OS: ≤ 3 weeks), Class 1 (OS: 3-24 weeks), Class 2 (OS: 24-52 weeks) and Class 3 (OS ≥ 52 weeks). Candidate covariate predictors consisted of 65 clinical, dosimetric and laboratory variables. Two supervised decision tree machine-learning models were trained and validated using the Python package. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) explanaibility analysis was performed to infer the global and local feature importance.
resultsThe SHAP analysis selected three laboratory variables, the interleukin8, haemoglobin and lymphocytes count as the first three ranked variables representing the major impact on OS in each of the four classes and accounting for more than 80% of contribution. In all classes, higher chance of OS was associated with low values of interleukin8 (IL8) and higher values of haemoglobin (HEM) and lymphocytes count (LYMPH). Pre-treatment values of IL8 > 36.7 relocated more than 50% of patients with survival < 3 weeks and only 1.5% of patient with survival > 52 weeks. On the other hand, pre-treatment values of IL8 < 19 relocated about 92% of patients with survival > 52 weeks. Patients are then additionally separated based on the lymphocytes count (LYMPH). LYMPH values higher than 7.5 will drive the probability of survival > 52 weeks still over 90% while it drops down to 2.1% for LYMPH < 7.5.
conclusionAn explainable machine learning approach based on decision trees is able to predict the survival at different timing after radiotherapy in patients with advanced cancer. This approach provides an intelligible explanation of individualized risk prediction, helping clinicians to identify the best strategy for patient stratification and treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.