ArticleThe Journal of school health2026
Pilot Study and Evaluation of a Sleep Health Education Program for Early High School.
Article in The Journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSleep education remains largely absent from high school health curricula, despite widespread insufficient sleep in adolescents. This pilot study evaluated Sleep Ninja for the Classroom, a curriculum-aligned sleep health education program for Australian high schools.
methodsParticipants were teachers (N = 12) and students in Year 7-8 (N = 428). Using a single-arm pre-post design, all students received the three-lesson program during regular health classes. Student sleep knowledge and behaviors were assessed, and a program evaluation examined student- and teacher-rated acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
resultsImprovements were observed in students' sleep knowledge, satisfaction with current sleep pattern, frequency of daytime napping, earlier weekend rise time (mean = 25-min), and weeknight bedtime (mean = 6-min). No changes were found in other sleep behaviors. Students spending < 8 h in bed at program commencement showed the most significant changes in bedtimes (mean = 54-min earlier on weeknights and 39-min earlier on weekends). Acceptability was high, with most students reporting the program was relevant and engaging, and all teachers rating the program as appropriate and feasible to implement. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Sleep Ninja for the Classroom is a brief, acceptable sleep education program that could be considered for inclusion in high school health curricula.
conclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence for an Australian curriculum-aligned sleep education program. Controlled studies are needed to evaluate longer-term outcomes and sustainable implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.