ArticleNEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery2026
Why and How to Monitor Deployed AI Systems in Health Care.
Article in NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Innovation to Impact: The CREATE Framework as a Blueprint for Large Language Model Adoption in Opioid Treatment Programs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Beyond Regulatory Approval: Lifecycle Assurance for Clinical Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Lessons from deploying the ChatEHR system at Stanford Medicine.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Digital Twins as the Implementation Layer of Precision Medicine in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Review
- Exploring the operational challenges of navigating ethical oversight in the era of artificial intelligence: a qualitative study of health research ethics committees in Tanzania.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- From Biosignals to Bedside: A Review of Real-Time Edge Machine Learning for Wearable Health Monitoring.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Federated artificial intelligence monitoring service (FAMOS): an in silico feasibility study.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in hepatology.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postdeployment monitoring of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in health care is essential to ensure their safety, quality, and sustained benefit - and to support governance decisions about which systems to update, modify, or decommission. Motivated by these needs, the authors developed a framework for monitoring deployed AI systems organized around three complementary principles: system integrity, performance, and impact. System integrity monitoring focuses on maximizing system uptime, detecting runtime errors, and identifying when changes to the surrounding information technology ecosystem have unintended effects. Performance monitoring focuses on maintaining accurate and equitable system behavior in the face of changing health care practices (and thus input data) over time. Impact monitoring assesses whether a deployed system continues to have value in the form of benefit to clinicians, staff, and patients. Drawing on examples of deployed AI systems at their academic medical center, the authors provide practical guidance for creating monitoring plans based on these principles that specify which metrics to measure and at what cadence, who is responsible for acting when metrics change, and what concrete follow-up actions should be taken - for both traditional and generative AI. They also discuss challenges in implementing this framework, including the effort of monitoring for health systems with limited resources, and the difficulty of incorporating data-driven monitoring practices into complex organizations where conflicting priorities and definitions of success often coexist. This framework offers a starting point for health systems seeking to ensure that AI deployments remain safe and effective over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42418612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.