ArticlePloS one2026
Compression benchmarking of holotomography data using OME-Zarr format.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Holotomography (HT) is a label-free, three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging technique that captures refractive index distributions of biological samples at sub-micron resolution. As modern HT systems enable high-throughput and large-scale acquisition, they produce terabyte-scale datasets that require efficient data management. This study presents a systematic benchmarking of data compression strategies for HT data stored in the OME-Zarr format, a cloud-compatible chunked data structure suitable for scalable imaging workflows. Using six representative datasets from five biological samples, we evaluated combinations of preprocessing filters and 13 compression algorithms across multiple compression levels. Performance was assessed in terms of compression ratio, bandwidth, and decompression speed. A throughput-based evaluation metric was introduced to capture realistic performance under varying network constraints, revealing that the optimal compression strategy is strongly dependent on available system bandwidth. Across a wide range of bandwidth conditions, Pcodec consistently exhibited the most balanced overall performance, followed by Blosc-zstd and zstd. The results offer practical guidance for the storage and transmission of large HT datasets and serve as a reference for implementing scalable, FAIR-aligned imaging workflows in cloud and high-performance computing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.