Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418513›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Air quality index prediction using machine learning regression models: A comparative analysis.

Fiaz Majeed, Sana Saleha, Laraib Abbas, Syed Ali Ghalib, Muhammad Hamid, Muhammad Saleem, Mohammed Aman, Arshad Ahmad

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fiaz MajeedDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Sana SalehaDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Laraib AbbasDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Syed Ali GhalibDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Muhammad HamidDepartment of Computer Science, Government College Women University, Sialkot, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2440-6596
Muhammad SaleemDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AmanDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Business and Technology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Arshad AhmadFaculty of Computing and IT, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-8365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air plays a vital role in human life, and poor air quality can lead to respiratory infections. Given the significant impact of air quality on people's health, monitoring and assessing air quality is crucial. With advancements in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), we now have extensive tools to measure the Air Quality Index (AQI). Air quality is influenced by various pollutants, including carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which are prevalent in highly polluted areas and contribute to a wide range of illnesses. Particulate matter, such as PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 µm) and PM10, poses additional health risks. To address these concerns, this study focuses on predicting AQI values for major cities in Pakistan, specifically Karachi and Peshawar, using four prominent ML algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Linear Regression (LR), and Ridge Regression (RR). The results indicate that the models effectively predicted AQI using evaluation metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the Coefficient of Determination (R2). This research's novelty lies in using the latest AQI datasets for Karachi and Peshawar and applying standard scaling for AQI normalization. Additionally, the study compares evaluation metric results across different cities, highlighting the importance of using standard scalers to achieve optimal model performance. This research underscores the value of advanced ML techniques for accurate AQI prediction and analysis.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionEnvironmental MonitoringMachine LearningAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsHumansNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSulfur DioxideAir PollutantsNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterSulfur Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID42418513
PMCPMC13345278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.