ArticlePloS one2026
Effects of node number of vine cuttings and planting methods on endogenous hormone contents at nodes and storage root formation in sweet potato.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Node Position Determines Sweetpotato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a globally significant dual-purpose crop, sweet potato yield is regulated by the node number of vine cuttings and the planting method. Elucidating the effects of stem segment number and soil-entry method on endogenous hormones within sweet potato nodes and storage root formation holds significant scientific value, providing theoretical basis and technical support for optimizing planting techniques and enhancing yields. A two-factor split-plot design was implemented from 2022 to 2023 using the Yuhongxinshu 98 cultivar. Main plots tested vine cuttings with 6 (A1), 8 (A2), or 10 nodes (A3). Subplots compared slanted planting with exposed tip (B1), flat planting with exposed tip (B2), and flat planting without exposed tip (B3). The study investigated the effects of these treatments on growth hormone content at nodes, root morphology, and yield. Results indicated that increasing vine cutting node number to 8 and 10 significantly enhanced early adventitious root development, including root length, root diameter, and root tip number, and increased aboveground branching. Compared with 6-node cuttings, 8- and 10-node cuttings increased storage root yield by 23.43% and 30.03%, respectively. Compared with slanting planting with exposed tip, flat planting with exposed tip and flat planting without exposed tip increased storage root yield by 20.11% and 18.10%, respectively. At 70 DAT, corresponding to the early storage root enlargement stage, ABA and IAA contents in buried nodes increased with vine cutting node number. IAA content showed a node-dependent pattern and peaked at the fourth buried node, whereas ABA content was highest at the second buried node. Correlation analysis showed that ABA and IAA contents were associated with storage root yield, storage root number, and root morphological traits. Nodal analysis indicated that storage root formation was mainly concentrated in the upper buried nodes, especially the second buried node, while flat planting increased the contribution of multiple buried nodes to storage root formation. Overall, 8-node vine cuttings combined with flat planting, especially A2B2 and A2B3, showed better performance in coordinating early root establishment, nodal storage root formation, and yield improvement. These findings provide a practical basis for optimizing sweet potato planting techniques through improved vine cutting node number and planting method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.