Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418479›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Table tennis and cognitive skills: A study on attention and decision making in sports science students.

Nurullah Çelik, Ceren Bolat, Ahmet Dönmez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nurullah ÇelikSakarya University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Ceren BolatIndependent Researcher, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ahmet DönmezAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Antalya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-4369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research aimed to reveal the effects of table tennis on students' careful decision-making and concentration skills. The study employed a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design with groups assigned through random allocation. The study was carried out with a total of 28 students (Xage = 20.65 ± 1.70), 14 of whom were studying at the department of physical education and sports of a state university and taking an elective table tennis course (Xage 19.79 ± 1.89) and 14 who did not take a table tennis course (Xage 21.43 ± 1.16). The data in the research were obtained using the "Personal Information Form", "D2 Attention Test" and "Melbourne Decision Making Scale". Analysis of variance (2x2 ANOVA) was used for repeated measures in the analysis of data. According to the research findings, an increase was observed in the pre-test-post-test mean scores for concentration and careful decision-making in the experimental group. Similarly, a smaller increase was observed in the control group. Analysis results revealed that the time effect was significant for the variables of concentration performance (F = 16.328; p < .001) and careful decision-making (F = 4.759; p = .038). However, it was determined that the group × time interaction was not significant for the variables of concentration performance (F = 1.879; p = 0.182) and careful decision-making (F = 3.933; p = 0.058). In conclusion, while table tennis is thought to contribute to the development of attention and decision-making skills, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to more clearly establish the intervention's effects.

Indexed as

AttentionCognitionDecision MakingStudentsFemaleHumansMaleSportsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42418479
PMCPMC13345294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.