ArticlePloS one2026
Inferring plant-bee-microbe associations: Foragers, hive workers, and honey tell complementary stories.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pollinators, both wild and managed, form diverse associations with plants and microbes which affect the wellbeing of the plants and the pollinators. The method by which these associations are sampled impacts our understanding of the system. The common ways to understand pollinator-plant or pollinator-plant-microbe associations are to observe flower visits of insects, or to collect foraging individuals and identify the pollen and microbes they carry. Honey bees offer a test case for methods of sampling these associations. Hives of managed honey bees host thousands of pollinator individuals together with jointly-collected nectar which is turned into honey. Previous studies have used DNA preserved in honey to infer honey bee associations with plants and microbes. Here, we sampled honey, individual bees while they were foraging, and groups of bees from inside the hive. We identified plants and microbes on the surface of the bees or in the honey using DNA metabarcoding - expecting that bees sampled singly or in groups would reveal a subset of the associations recorded in the communal honey deposits. However, we found that each sample type revealed different aspects of the richness and community composition of plants and microbes encountered by bees. Both honey samples and hive bees had more plant and microbial taxa per sample than samples of individual bees. Though individual bees are subsets of the larger colony, pollen and microbe associations recovered from individual bees did not represent a subsample of associations recovered from groups of hive bees or from honey. Thus, while each sampling technique provides information about honey bee ecology, they are not equivalent. DNA in honey represents time-integrated associations between bees and the surrounding ecosystem; the hive bees provide a snapshot of current colony-level associations, and individual foraging bees capture intraspecific variation in foraging preferences and microbe exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.