ArticlePloS one2026
Sample-efficient fine-tuning with textual prompts for time series forecasting.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time series forecasting models often face challenges in cross-domain fine-tuning, such as high training costs and limited adaptability. To address these issues, we propose a Cue-driven Feature Fusion Network (CFF-Net), which combines semantic cues from textual prompts with numerical time series features for parameter-efficient adaptation. The main idea is to use the semantic representation ability of large language models to provide auxiliary guidance, while dynamically modulating numerical predictions through scale-and-shift operations. Specifically, CFF-Net includes three main components. First, the Semantic Prompt Encoding Module (SPM) transforms numerical sequences into temporally relevant natural language descriptions, which are processed by GPT-2 to extract semantic representations. Second, the Dynamic Semantic Modulation Module (DSM) maps these semantic representations into learnable scaling (γ) and shifting (β) factors through a multi-layer perceptron, enabling modulation of PatchTST predictions within the Scale-and-Shift Feature (SSF) mechanism. Finally, a warm-start strategy is used to stabilize semantic integration during training. Experimental results on three public datasets and the TCTS dataset show that CFF-Net achieves lower errors than PatchTST in many settings, although the improvements are not uniform across all datasets and metrics. For example, on the Weather dataset, CFF-Net reduces MSE by 12.50% and 11.88% under the 30% and 20% training-sample settings, respectively. On the TCTS dataset, the corresponding MSE reductions are 5.83% and 6.60%. These results suggest that semantic prompt guidance can improve forecasting performance in several limited-data scenarios while keeping most backbone parameters fixed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.