ArticleJMIR nursing2026
The Shift From Efficacy to Implementation Science (2020-2026) in Nursing Practice for Digital Mental Health: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis.
Article in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nurses are pivotal as end users and implementers of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs). However, the successful translation of efficacious DMHIs into sustainable nursing practice is hindered by multifaceted implementation challenges. Objective: This study aimed to systematically map and analyze the evolving research landscape of nurse-involved DMHIs to determine if a paradigm shift from efficacy testing to implementation science is occurring and characterize the methodological and thematic trends associated with this shift. Methods: We conducted a scoping review integrated with a bibliometric analysis following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed databases (January 2020 to April 2026) yielded 1014 eligible primary research studies. Studies were classified as "efficacy/effectiveness" or "implementation" research using a validated framework. We analyzed temporal trends and methodological designs and performed co-word thematic mapping. Results: Implementation research constituted the largest proportion of clearly classified studies (327/470, 69.6%), exceeding efficacy research (143/470, 30.4%). Implementation research demonstrated a significant growth trajectory from 2020 to 2025 (β=8.63 articles per year; P=.003), surpassing efficacy research in 2022. Implementation studies used more mixed methods (105/327, 32.1% vs 7/143, 4.9%; P<.001) and qualitative designs (92/327, 28.1% vs 2/143, 1.4%; P<.001). Thematic analysis revealed "nursing workflow integration" and "nurse-led implementation" as emerging motor themes. Conclusions: This review provides robust evidence of an accelerating turn to implementation in digital mental health research in nursing. The field is moving beyond internal validity toward real-world implementation. Future efforts should focus on implementation-ready digital tools and embedding implementation science competencies into nursing education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.