Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418305›Full record

Trial reportEuropean stroke journal2026

Contemporary achievement of guideline recommendations for blood pressure management after stroke in the CONVINCE trial.

Pádraig Synnott, Cathal Walsh, Christian Weimar, Francisco Purroy, Chris Price, Ana Catarina Fonseca, Michael Hill, Dalius Jatuzis, Janika Kõrv, Christina Kruuse and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02898610 (CONVINCE -), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02898610 phase3completednot on this map

CONVINCE - (COlchicine for preventioN of Vascular Inflammation in Non- CardioEmbolic Stroke) - a Randomised Clinical Trial of Low-dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College DublinRan2016 to 2024Enrolled3,154ConditionsIschemic Attack, Transient, StrokeArmsColchicine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Pádraig SynnottHealth Research Board (HRB) Stroke Clinical Trials Network Ireland (SCTNI), UCD Clinical Research Centre, Nelson Street, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-8754
Cathal WalshTCD Biostatistics Unit, Discipline of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Christian WeimarInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Francisco PurroyStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1808-5968
Chris PricePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Ana Catarina FonsecaDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health (Neurology), Hospital Santa Maria-CHLN, Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Michael HillDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences & Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Dalius JatuzisCentre of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Janika KõrvDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Christina KruuseDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, and Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robert MikulikInternational Clinical Research Center and Department of Neurology, St Anne's University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Paul NederkoornDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anna Czlonkowska2nd Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1956-1866
Urs FischerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0521-4051
Darius G NabaviDepartment of Neurology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Joseph HarbisonDepartment of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3680-5751
Tim CassidyAcute Stroke Service, St Vincent's Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Margaret O'ConnorDepartment of Ageing and Therapeutics, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Helle Klingenberg IversenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katja AdieCare of Elderly Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, United Kingdom.
Robin LemmensDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4948-5956
Peter J KellyHealth Research Board (HRB) Stroke Clinical Trials Network Ireland (SCTNI), UCD Clinical Research Centre, Nelson Street, Dublin, Ireland.
CONVINCE investigators

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 397530000FWO-Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (Research Foundation Flanders), BelgiumHealth Research Board Ireland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for stroke. Studies between 1996 and 2013 reported high rates of non-achievement of guideline recommended blood pressure (BP) targets following stroke/TIA. Few recent large studies of long-term post-stroke BP management exist, and no studies have reported findings since the introduction of new guideline recommendations (systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 130 mmHg) in 2022. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analysed BP control in the CONVINCE trial, which randomised 3154 recent ischaemic stroke/high-risk TIA patients to colchicine 0.5 mg daily or usual care. Clinic BP was measured at 6-monthly trial visits from 2017 to 2024. We calculated mean follow-up BP using all available follow-up BP measurements, and examined factors associated with non-achievement of pre-2022 guideline BP targets by multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOf 3144 randomised consenting patients, at least 1 follow-up BP reading was available for 2920. There were high rates of antiplatelet medication (97.6%) and statin (94.1%) usage. Mean SBP during follow-up was 136.6 mmHg (SD 12.8), mean diastolic BP was 79.3 mmHg (SD 7.8). A total of 36% of participants had mean SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and failed to meet pre-2022 guideline targets, while 70% had mean SBP ≥ 130 mmHg, not achieving current guideline targets. On multivariable logistic regression, increased age (OR: 1.026 per year increase; 95% CI, 1.018-1.034), history of hypertension (OR: 1.47; 95% CI, 1.24-1.74) and lacunar stroke subtype (OR: 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.49) were independently associated with guideline non-achievement. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionIn a large contemporary secondary stroke prevention trial, over one-third of participants did not achieve less-stringent pre-2022 BP guideline targets, and 70% did not achieve current ESO guideline targets. New approaches are needed to improve guideline implementation in practice.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02898610).

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionStrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicAntihypertensive Agentshypertensionrecurrent strokesecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID42418305
PMCPMC13344104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.