ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2026
Belonging in Reduced-Size Classrooms: Student Outcomes Among Chinese Upper Secondary Students With Intellectual and Other Documented Disabilities.
Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInternational debates on inclusive education often position reduced-size or specialized classrooms as either supportive provision or potentially segregating placement. Student-perspective evidence remains limited, particularly for upper secondary students with intellectual and other documented disabilities.
methodsThis sequential explanatory mixed-methods study examined associations between reduced-size classroom (RSC) placement and academic and socio-emotional outcomes among 153 upper secondary students with documented disabilities in Wuhan, China. Students were enrolled in RSCs of no more than eight students (n = 47) or mainstream classrooms with resource-room support (n = 106). Structural equation modelling estimated direct and indirect associations involving social integration, teacher support and academic self-efficacy, with prior special education experience treated as a key covariate. Semistructured interviews with nine RSC students explained and contextualized the quantitative patterns.
resultsAfter adjustment, RSC placement remained statistically associated with social integration, teacher support and academic self-efficacy, although estimates were attenuated. Bootstrap estimates supported indirect associations with subjective well-being through social integration and teacher support, and with academic achievement through teacher support and academic self-efficacy. Interviews highlighted belonging, personalized instruction, teacher closeness, reduced anxiety and academic confidence, while showing that students valued support quality more than placement labels.
conclusionsReduced-size placement was associated with more favourable student-reported outcomes when students perceived stronger relational security, individualized instruction and teacher support. Because placement was nonrandom and the quantitative data were cross-sectional, findings should be interpreted as associational rather than causal. The study shifts attention from a simple inclusion-versus-segregation binary toward placement quality and support processes that may be especially relevant for students with substantial support needs in upper secondary education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.