Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418270›Full record

ReviewThe neurologist2026

A Narrative Review of Amyloid-β Monoclonal Antibodies for Alzheimer Disease: How Amyloid Species Engagement May Affect Clinical Outcomes.

Richard J Caselli, David S Geldmacher, Traci B Schilling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The neurologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard J CaselliDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
David S GeldmacherDepartment of Neurology, Marnix E. Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Traci B SchillingEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading cause of death worldwide, with growing prevalence as life expectancy increases. An important neurological hallmark of AD is the deposition of extracellular neuritic amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques that can disrupt synaptic transmission and cause neuronal death. More recent studies suggest that targeting Aβ species can slow the progression of cognitive decline in AD. REVIEW SUMMARY: This narrative review examines the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies targeting the amyloid-β (Aβ) protein in the treatment of AD. It discusses the mechanisms by which these antibodies aim to mitigate amyloid pathology and explores their clinical outcomes in various trials. The review highlights the importance of amyloid plaque reduction to less than 25 Centiloids observed through amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scans as a predictor of slowing cognitive decline. The findings suggest that targeting insoluble amyloid plaques is crucial for achieving clinical benefits in AD treatment. This review also discusses the phenomenon of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) that may be associated with monoclonal antibody therapy.

conclusionMonoclonal antibodies that target Aβ monomers, soluble oligomers and protofibrils, and insoluble fibrils/plaques were developed, and not all have provided clinical benefit. Emerging evidence suggests that it is important to reduce amyloid plaque burden to less than 25 Centiloids, consistent with a visually negative amyloid PET scan, in order to slow cognitive decline in early symptomatic AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAnimalsHumansPlaque, AmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAlzheimer diseaseamyloid-β (Aβ) plaqueARIAmonoclonal antibodies

Identifiers

PMID42418270
PMCPMC13317900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.