ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Prescriber's Preferences for Digital Health Applications in Mental Health Care: Cross-Sectional Best-Worst Scaling Study of General Practitioners and Psychotherapists in Germany.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental disorders affect nearly one-third of adults in Germany, with a 12-month prevalence of approximately 28%. Following Germany's 2019 Digital Care Act, digital health applications (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen [DiGA]) became reimbursable interventions by the statutory health insurance for mental health conditions. However, adoption remains uneven. General practitioners (GPs) issue most mental health DiGA prescriptions, while psychotherapists or psychiatrists prescribe far fewer, even though most DiGA target mental health. Existing studies imply profession-specific barriers but lack quantitative evidence on preference drivers or remain descriptive. Whether and how these preferences differ across professional groups has not been systematically quantified.
objectiveThis study aimed to quantify and compare GPs' and psychotherapists' or psychiatrists' preferences for factors associated with DiGA prescription decisions using best-worst scaling (BWS).
methodsA cross-sectional BWS study was conducted among outpatient GPs and psychotherapists or psychiatrists. Eleven DiGA objects were evaluated using a balanced incomplete block design. Preferences were analyzed using conditional logit regression. Likelihood ratio tests assessed differences between professional groups, with stratified models estimating group-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs.
resultsOf 484 respondents (244 GPs and 240 psychotherapists or psychiatrists), 408 completed the BWS experiment. Group-specific ORs ranged from 0.47 to 1.72 (likelihood ratio test: χ
conclusionsProfessional role is a source of preference heterogeneity for factors associated with DiGA prescription decisions. GPs assigned comparatively greater weight to evidence-based recommendations and patient interest, while psychotherapists or psychiatrists emphasized technical integration feasibility and peer experience. These structured differences in priority gradients indicate that uniform implementation approaches may not adequately reflect the evaluative frameworks of both professional groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.