ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026
Striving for Triadic Collaboration in Pediatric Speech Sound Disorder Intervention: Grounded Theory Study.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCollaboration between speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and parents is central to pediatric speech sound disorder (SSD) intervention. Prior research has emphasized the relational and home-practice components of collaboration; however, little is known about the enactment, organization, and maintenance of collaborative processes across SLP sessions and home practice in relation to speech sound generalization.
objectiveThis study examined the enactment and organization of collaboration between SLPs and parents in pediatric SSD intervention, with attention to children's participation. Using a grounded theory approach, it aimed to develop an empirically grounded conceptual account of how collaboration is organized in relation to speech sound generalization.
methodsThis qualitative study adopted a Strauss and Corbin-oriented grounded theory approach. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 SLPs and 10 parents of children aged 4 to 7 years receiving SSD intervention in South Korea. Data collection and analysis proceeded iteratively using open, axial, and selective coding with constant comparison. A paradigm model explicated relationships among categories, and selective coding integrated categories around a core category.
resultsThe central phenomenon was conceptualized as striving for triadic collaboration, reflecting SLPs' and parents' efforts to coordinate roles, expectations, and practice while supporting children's participation across SLP sessions and home practice. Three interrelated action/interaction strategies were identified: SLP-led monitoring strategies, parent-led home-based intervention strategies, and gradual motivation strategies. These collaborative processes were shaped by background and practice-level constraints. A category integration diagram was developed to represent how the core category, action/interaction strategies, and contextual concerns were organized around triadic collaboration.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that collaboration in pediatric SSD intervention is a contextually embedded process in which SLPs and parents coordinate roles and practices across SLP sessions and home practice while supporting children's participation. The category integration diagram represents how collaborative processes were organized across settings in relation to the gap between structured target sound production and everyday speech use. These findings highlight the relevance of coordinated collaboration for supporting practice across settings in relation to speech sound generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.