ReviewJAMA psychiatry2026
Toward a Pluralistic Model for the Schizophrenia Spectrum-Dopamine and Beyond.
Review in JAMA psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Dopaminergic dysregulation has been considered the final common pathway for pathophysiology of schizophrenia and related disorders (SRD). However, this model does not adequately explain treatment resistance, cognitive impairment, negative symptoms, and marked biological heterogeneity across patients. Objective: To examine whether SRD are best conceptualized as resulting from a final common dopaminergic pathway or from several partially independent neurochemical mechanisms and to evaluate the implications of these models for treatment development. Evidence Review: Neuroimaging, postmortem and genetic investigations, pharmacologic challenge paradigms, clinical trials, and animal models published between 1980 and 2025 were synthesized. Studies were identified through expert knowledge and targeted searches of PubMed and related databases. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and multimodal convergent findings were emphasized. Evidence was appraised qualitatively with attention to consistency, specificity, and translational relevance. Findings: Positive psychotic symptoms are strongly linked to increased presynaptic dopaminergic activity in the associative striatum, which predicts response to dopamine D2 receptor antagonists. However, approximately one-third of patients exhibit treatment resistance and show no increase in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity. Increasing evidence implicates glutamatergic, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic, serotonergic, cholinergic, endocannabinoid, and opioidergic systems, as well as nonneurotransmitter processes including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation. The efficacy of the muscarinic M1/M4-preferring agonist xanomeline-trospium, which lacks direct D2 receptor antagonism, suggests that nondopaminergic mechanisms can reduce psychotic symptoms. Neurochemically distinct subgroups within SRD may cut across overlapping clinical phenotypes. Conclusions and Relevance: Dopaminergic hyperactivity may be a key mechanism for core psychotic symptoms in many patients, but it is unlikely that dopamine dysregulation is a universal final common pathway across symptom domains. A pluralistic model-recognizing multiple interacting neurochemical and cellular processes-may better account for heterogeneity and translational failures. Future development of novel treatments may depend on biomarker-informed stratification, mechanism-based clinical trials, and integration of molecular, circuit-level, and clinical phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.