Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418144›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026

Assessment of internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity of PROMIS

Andrew J Latham, John A O'Dell, Thanh Ho, Shelley Chavis, Silvia E Smith

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew J LathamUniversity of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, USA.
John A O'DellUniversity of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, USA.
Thanh Ho
Shelley ChavisUniversity of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, USA.
Silvia E SmithUniversity of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, USA. silvia.smith@uncp.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3981-4592

Funding

University of North Carolina at Pembroke College of Arts and Sciences Research Grant (2025)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDyspnea, or shortness of breath, is frequently reported among individuals with autonomic nervous system dysfunction, or dysautonomia. Currently, there are no validated dyspnea-specific patient-reported outcome measures for this population. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a patient-reported outcomes study to evaluate the internal consistency, reliability, and concurrent criterion-related validity of three PROMIS

resultsOf the 617 participants enrolled in this study, 414 individuals without comorbid conditions causing dyspnea were included in the primary analysis. The PROMIS

conclusionThese findings support the use of the PROMIS

Indexed as

DyspneaPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrimary DysautonomiasQuality of LifeAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesDysautonomiaDyspneaInstrument validationPatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42418144
PMCPMC13461994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.