ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Practice patterns of DOAC high-intensity period following parenteral lead-in treatment for venous thromboembolism.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the acute care setting, consensus is lacking on whether patients initially treated with parenteral anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) should complete the full high-intensity period (HIP) of apixaban or rivaroxaban. This study examines HIP prescribing patterns following parenteral anticoagulation and assesses the influence of patient, provider, and facility characteristics. Patients initiating rivaroxaban or apixaban for VTE after parenteral anticoagulation were identified from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) database between November 2015 and March 2024. Those with an indeterminate duration of parenteral treatment were excluded. Patients were categorized into full HIP and shortened HIP cohorts based on DOAC dose and duration. Demographics and comorbidities were compared using Student's t-test and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. Variables with p < 0.3 were included in a logistic regression model, with stepwise selection at a 0.1 significance threshold. Among 816 patients, 687 (84.2%) received the full HIP, while 129 (15.8%) had a shortened HIP. Patients with private insurance (OR 0.3 [0.11-0.82], p = 0.02) or Medicare (OR 0.31 [0.11-0.92], p = 0.04) were less likely to receive a shortened HIP than Medicaid patients. Higher HAS-BLED scores were associated with increased odds of receiving a shortened HIP (OR 1.32 [1.1-1.59], p = 0.003). Provider type did not significantly impact HIP prescribing patterns. Despite prior parenteral anticoagulation, most patients completed the full DOAC HIP. Further research is needed to assess how patient, provider, and facility factors influence decision-making and to evaluate the impact of these decisions on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42418136What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.