SynthesisNeurotoxicity research2026
Biological Effects of High-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on CNS Function and Neuroimmune Responses: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Experimental Studies.
Synthesis in Neurotoxicity research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background the deployment of fifth-generation (5G) wireless telecommunications infrastructure, incorporating millimeter-wave (mmWave, 24-100 GHz) and sub-6 GHz frequencies, has renewed scientific and public health interest in the potential neurobiological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). While extensive research has examined lower-frequency RF-EMF from 2G/3G/4G technologies, the specific effects of mmWave frequencies on CNS cellular biology-including microglial polarization and intracellular calcium signaling-remain less characterized. This systematic review evaluates experimental evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies on the effects of high-frequency EMF (300 MHz-300 GHz) on neuroimmune responses, microglial function, CNS calcium homeostasis, and related outcomes. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the EMF-Portal were searched from inception to January 2026 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Experimental (in vitro and animal) studies reporting CNS-relevant outcomes after high-frequency RF-EMF exposure were eligible. Exposure must have been within the 300 MHz to 300 GHz range. Quality assessment used adapted OHAT risk-of-bias criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted; quantitative pooling was performed where three or more studies reported the same outcome. Results forty-one studies met inclusion criteria (see PRISMA Flow Diagram, Fig. 1): 7 in vitro (cell culture), 29 in vivo (rodent model), and 5 reviews/meta-analyses. The detailed characteristics of all included studies are summarized in Table 1. At specific absorption rate (SAR) levels at or below the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) general public exposure guidelines (2 W/kg averaged over 10 g), the majority of studies (27/41, 66%) found no statistically significant effects on neuroinflammatory markers, microglial morphology, or calcium signaling. Eleven studies (27%) reported transient, low-magnitude increases in intracellular Ca²⁺ or pro-inflammatory cytokine expression at exposures near or exceeding guideline limits; these effects were not consistently reproducible across independent laboratories. Three studies (7%) reported effects below guideline thresholds that may warrant further investigation. No study identified neuropathological changes (neuronal death, axonal injury) attributable to RF-EMF at guideline-compliant exposures. Conclusions current experimental evidence does not establish that high-frequency RF-EMF at guideline-compliant exposure levels produces significant adverse effects on microglial polarization, CNS calcium homeostasis, or neuroinflammatory responses. Methodological heterogeneity, inadequate dosimetry, and limited independent replication constrain confidence in both positive and negative findings. Standardized, rigorously controlled experimental studies are needed, particularly for mmWave frequencies (> 6 GHz) where data are sparse. Our findings support the current scientific consensus that high-frequency RF-EMF below regulatory limits does not pose a clearly established neurobiological hazard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42418111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.