ReviewCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2026
The malignant synapse: architecture, signal integration, and therapeutic vulnerabilities in glioma.
Review in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence has fundamentally reshaped the neuro-oncological paradigm, revealing that gliomas and brain metastases are not isolated cellular masses but synaptically integrated entities within the brain's neural circuitry. This review comprehensively delineates the architecture and multi-modal signaling landscape of the "malignant synapse." We explore how diverse pre-synaptic inputs-encompassing glutamatergic, cholinergic, and GABAergic signals-are structurally anchored by matricellular organizers (like thrombospondins) and proteolytically cleaved factors (like sNLGN3). Post-synaptically, glioma cells deploy a sophisticated array of effectors to translate these neural inputs. Through a convergence of electrochemical (AMPAR-mediated), mechanosensory (CSPG4-PIEZO1 cascade), and metabolic (CHRM3 and TrkB) axes, these diverse signals universally ignite the PI3K-mTOR signaling hub, which is further amplified across the tumor mass via the Connexin-43-coupled tumor microtube (TM) syncytium. Recognizing this profound reliance on neural inputs exposes a critical therapeutic vulnerability. We systematically evaluate pharmacological strategies to disconnect these malignant circuits, highlighting the repurposing of neuroactive drugs-including perampanel, gabapentin, and bumetanide-to effectively stall tumor progression. Finally, we address formidable translational challenges, such as blood-brain barrier penetrance and off-target neurotoxicity. We also outline future frontiers, particularly leveraging spatial multi-omics to decode how synaptic signaling orchestrates the tumor immune microenvironment. Ultimately, dismantling the neuron-glioma axis represents a transformative frontier in conquering intractable brain cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.