ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Risk Factors Associated with Recurrent Biliary Obstruction After Endoscopic Bilioduodenal Double Stenting.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEndoscopic bilioduodenal double stenting is sometimes necessary for patients with malignant bilioduodenal obstruction (MBDO). The patency of biliary stents is important for preventing cholangitis and continuing treatment. However, the factors that influence recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) in patients with MBDO are not well known. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with RBO in patients who underwent endoscopic bilioduodenal double stenting.
methodsPatient characteristics, device use, and endoscopic treatment procedures were evaluated as possible risk factors for RBO.
resultsOverall, 55 patients with MBDO underwent endoscopic bilioduodenal double stenting (transpapillary drainage, n = 35; endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage, n = 20). Multivariate analysis using a Fine and Gray competing risk model revealed that biliary stenting on the oral side of the duodenal stricture (HR 2.98; 95% CI 1.16-7.68; p = 0.023) and chemotherapy (HR 3.74; 95% CI 1.25-11.22; p = 0.018) were significantly associated with RBO.
conclusionBiliary stenting on the oral side of the duodenal stricture was associated with RBO during duodenal stenting in patients with MBDO. Although chemotherapy was also associated with RBO in the multivariable competing risk analysis, this finding should be interpreted cautiously. Careful treatment selection, including consideration of gastrojejunostomy in patients with oral-side biliary stenting, may help reduce the incidence of RBO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42418074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.