ArticleFolia microbiologica2026
Isolation, characterization, and proof of concept evaluation of serially adapted bacteriophages against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to test serially passaged bacteriophages for combating multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli strains and to address the urgent need for sustainable alternatives to antibiotics. Bacteriophages were isolated from diverse environmental sources against E. coli MTCC 1687. All bacteriophages were sequentially passaged for adaptation against three multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, E. coli (R1, R2, and R4), with host efficiency expansion measured by efficiency of plating (EOP). Two phages (VR1 and VR4*) were selected based on their in vitro lytic, antibiofilm activity, and live-dead analysis. Both phages were characterized for adsorption kinetics, one-step growth parameters, pH tolerance, and thermal stability. A proof-of-concept in vivo study was conducted with a two-phage (VR1 and VR4*) cocktail. Phages were orally delivered in drinking water to one-week-old chickens 24 h after an intraperitoneal challenge with MDR E. coli R4. Bacteriophages exhibited significant lytic and antibiofilm activity in a dose-dependent manner. Short latent periods of 10 min (VR1) and 15 min (VR4*), stability > 50% at pH ≥ 4, when formulated in a stabilizing buffer, and thermal stability at room temperature were observed in the bacteriophages. In the proof-of-concept study of a controlled chicken infection model using a resistant E. coli strain, an orally administered two-phage cocktail (VR1 and VR4*) achieved 100% survival over a 7-day observation period. Lesion severity and histopathological outcomes were comparable to those of antibiotic treatment. This research established a proof-of-concept for host-adapted bacteriophages as adaptable and potent antimicrobial agents against field-isolated multidrug-resistant strains. The findings provide preliminary support for developing a phage platform to improve animal health, food safety, and, ultimately, human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42418069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.