Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42418056›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research communications2026

Automated fish disease diagnosis in aquaculture using convolutional neural networks: a narrative review of methods, applications, and challenges.

Humza Shaikh, Al-Zahraa Mamdouh, Fatma Ahmed, Eman Zahran, Ahmed Mustafa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Humza ShaikhDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, 46805, USA.
Al-Zahraa MamdouhFish Diseases Department, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Cairo, Egypt.
Fatma AhmedDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Sohag, 82524, Egypt.
Eman ZahranDepartment of Aquatic Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. emanzahran@mans.edu.eg.
Ahmed MustafaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, 46805, USA. mustafaa@pfw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review explores advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, particularly Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), for automated fish disease diagnosis, including key technologies, clinical applications, ethical constraints, and future insights. Given that fish disease diagnosis is essential for the aquaculture industry and that the diagnostic tools are costly, it was imperative to employ Artificial Intelligence (AI) to automate fish disease management. Within this context, the CNN-based analysis has been integrated into fish disease diagnosis, suggesting its key role in improving disease management practices in different aquaculture systems. This integration enhances practitioners' and researchers' knowledge, understanding, and advances their ability to improve management practices within aquaculture systems. This review presents modern tools based on CNN models for aquaculture, including image acquisition, preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction, classification, transfer learning, and deployment. Additionally, it highlights broader applications of computer vision in aquaculture, the performance of the outputs, and the challenges that limit real-world implementation. These include poor data quality, class imbalance, domain shift, overfitting, limited interpretability, uncertainty in model predictions, reduced robustness under field imaging conditions, and the need for continuous human supervision. However, many studies have reported encouraging experimental outcomes; systems based on CNNs have not yet been investigated across different farm settings, imaging conditions, and disease stages. Thus, CNNs should be considered earlier diagnostic and supportive decision tools rather than a replacement for veterinary diagnosis or laboratory confirmation. These AI models have been trained and validated; however, they may still not represent the farming environment variability. Therefore, we were keen to address these limitations, which are essential to translating experimental success into practical disease management.

Indexed as

AquacultureConvolutional Neural NetworksFish DiseasesAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceFishesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedDiagnosisFish DiseasesImage Analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.