ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Hydrocortisone use in France: current practices in 2026.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, new evidence has emerged regarding postnatal corticosteroids use in extremely preterm infants, particularly early prophylactic hydrocortisone. In France, national recommendations published in 2010 address late postnatal corticosteroids use only and do not incorporate the most evidence-based data. We aimed to provide a national overview of prescribing practices in French neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), focusing on prophylactic hydrocortisone. A national survey was conducted between 1 June and 13 August 2024 among all 66 French level III NICUs using a structured online questionnaire. One response per center was gathered. Fifty-five of 66 (83%) NICUs responded. Prophylactic hydrocortisone was used in 33 (60%) centers: 16 (29%) systematically and 17 (31%) selectively. Among users, 21 (64%) targeted the same population as the PREMILOC study. Non-users cited concerns about benefit-risk balance, lack of evidence, and absence of national guidelines. Fear of neurodevelopmental risk was more frequent among non-users (9/22 (41%) vs 1/33 (3%), p < 0.001), while perceived spontaneous intestinal perforation risk did not differ.
conclusionHydrocortisone use in French NICUs remain heterogeneous due to safety concerns and a possible uncertainty about the strength of evidence. These findings underscore the need for updated national guidelines to support harmonized, evidence-based care for ELGANs. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Recent evidence supports prophylactic hydrocortisone to improve survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants. • French national recommendations (2010) address late corticosteroid use (beyond 3 weeks) and do not incorporate recent evidence-based data. WHAT IS NEW: • This national survey provides the first overview of hydrocortisone use in French NICUs, highlighting heterogeneity in prescribing practices. • It identifies discrepancies between evidence and clinical practice, supporting the need for updated guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.