ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
Association of induced abortion with bipolar disorder and major depression from the UK Biobank: a propensity score matching and weighting analysis.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Cross-Sectional Study on the Association Between Abortion and Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression: Evidence from the UK Biobank.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the association between induced abortion (IA) and bipolar disorder and major depression (BDMD), and explore the dose-response relationship between them.
methodsWe used cross-sectional data including 13,200 females from the UK Biobank. Self-reported IA was categorized into two groups: Non-IA(no history of induced abortion) and IA(≥ 1 induced abortions). Covariates adjustment, propensity score matching (PSM), and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups. A three-knot restricted cubic spline regression model was used to examine the dose-response relationship between the number of IAs and BDMD.
resultsIPTW multivariable logistic regression and PSM multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that there was a significant association between IA and BDMD, with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19 to 1.32) and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.41), respectively. There was a significant positive association between the number of IAs and BDMD. Specifically, for individuals reporting 1-2 IAs compared to none, the ORs were 1.25 (95% CI: 1.18 to 1.32) and 1.23 (95% CI: 1.09 to 1.40), and for those with ≥ 3 IAs, the ORs were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.59) and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.13 to 2.34). The three-knot restricted cubic spline regression model revealed a nonlinear relationship between the number of IAs and BDMD.
conclusionThere is a significant association between IA and BDMD. Therefore, mental health care for women who reported experiencing induced abortion is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42417991What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.