ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026
Metagenomics comparison identifies shared pathogenic microbiome in humans, pigs and chickens.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating human, animal, and environmental health is crucial for combating infectious diseases, as an estimated 60 to 75% of emerging infectious diseases originate from zoonotic sources globally. In this study, we analysed 1274 shotgun metagenomic faecal samples of humans, pigs, and chickens collected across multiple countries to estimate levels of microbial sharing at the species-level genome bins (SGBs) resolution. We confirm that host species, rather than geography, significantly structures the gut microbial community, as shown by alpha and beta diversity analyses. Despite this high host specificity, we identified substantial cross-host sharing of SGBs, including taxa recognised as pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium innocuum, Clostridium disporicum, Enterococcus species, and Streptococcus alactolyticus. Core taxa were predominantly host-specific, while non-core taxa were more frequently shared across humans, pigs, and chickens. LEfSe analysis identified distinctive microbial signatures for each host, further supporting differences in community composition. These findings demonstrate that unrelated and geographically distant humans and livestock can harbour highly similar microbial populations with pathogenic potential. This work provides molecular evidence supporting the need for integrated One Health surveillance to better detect, manage, and prevent zoonotic and reverse zoonotic transmission events across interconnected human, animal, and environmental systems. KEY POINTS: • There is substantial cross-host sharing of species-level genome bins, including potential pathogens • Core taxa are predominantly host-specific • Non-core taxa are more likely to be shared across humans, pigs, and chickens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42417977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.