ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Can the outpatient parathormone value be used instead of the initial value in intraoperative parathormone measurement during primary hyperparathyroidism surgery?
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) measurement is widely used to confirm surgical success in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). The Miami criterion is the most widely used. Despite the significant advantages of IOPTH, its cost remains a matter of debate. This study aimed to investigate the necessity of pre-excision parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement during parathyroidectomy in PHPT patients. The files of 159 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy in our department between January 2022 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT were included. Patients with secondary/tertiary hyperparathyroidism and those with incomplete data were excluded. PTH levels were measured in all patients at the outpatient clinic (OPC-PTH), before incision [pre-incision IOPTH (IOPTH1)] and 10 min after pathologic gland(s) excision [post-excision IOPTH (IOPTH2)] intraoperatively. OPC-PTH/IOPTH2 and IOPTH1/IOPTH2 results were compared, and a decrease of > 50% was considered a successful excision. Cure is defined as postoperative normocalcemia. A total of 122 patients who met the study criteria were included. The median age was 55 years (20-80 years). One hundred and three patients (84.4%) were female. A total of 3 (2.5%) patients had persistent disease. The accuracy rates for OPC-PTH/IOPTH2 and IOPTH1/IOPTH2 for cure prediction were 91% and 93.4% respectively, and no statistically significant difference was found between methods (p = 0.474). Evaluating outpatient PTH levels with post-excision PTH levels can be used to confirm surgical success with high accuracy. Using this method can offer advantages in terms of both operative time and cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42417941What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.