ReviewUpdates in surgery2026
Perioperative corticosteroids and pancreatic surgery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis combining human expertise and AI support (ChatGPT).
Review in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is associated with high postoperative morbidity. The role of corticosteroids (CCS) in pancreatic surgery remains uncertain. Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included patients undergoing pancreatic resection with perioperative CCS administration. Primary outcomes were mortality, morbidity and surgical site infections (SSI). Data extraction was cross-validated with artificial intelligence (ChatGPT). Nine studies (1913 patients), including five RCTs (554 patients), were included. CCS regimens consisted of hydrocortisone or dexamethasone, with or without postoperative continuation. The analysis showed no significant differences in mortality or major complications. Data from RCTs showed that CCS reduced SSI (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.32-0.91, p = 0.02). Also, among patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, CCS reduced morbidity (OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.39-0.98), SSI (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.40-0.82), and shortened hospital stay (MD -1.57 days, p = 0.04). Agreement between manual and AI-assisted data extraction was high (r = 0.97-1.00), but substantial discrepancies were found. Perioperative CCS appear safe in pancreatic surgery and may reduce morbidity and SSI. Large multicentre RCTs are needed to define optimal regimens and identify patients most likely to benefit. AI-assisted review may complement traditional approaches but still require further refinement before they can be considered as reliable as human effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42417940What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.