Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42417928›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026

Positive peritoneal cytology and recurrence patterns in endometrial cancer according to postoperative recurrence risk classification: a retrospective cohort study.

Nozomi Yachida, Megumi Kurosawa, Kyota Saito, Hidehiko Akashi, Miho Suzuki, Risa Kudo, Ryo Tamura, Takahiro Minamikawa, Akiko Kobayashi, Sosuke Adachi and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nozomi YachidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Megumi KurosawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Kyota SaitoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Hidehiko AkashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Miho SuzukiDepartment of Familial and Hereditary Oncology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata City, Japan.
Risa KudoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Ryo TamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Takahiro MinamikawaDepartment of Women's Wellness, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Akiko KobayashiDepartment of Women's Wellness, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Sosuke AdachiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan.
Koji NishinoDepartment of Gynecology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata City, Japan.
Kosuke YoshiharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University Graduate, Niigata City, Japan. yoshikou@med.niigata-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2254-3378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe clinical significance of positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) in endometrial cancer remains controversial, particularly in low-risk disease. This study investigated the distribution of PPC across postoperative recurrence risk groups and its associations with clinicopathological features, recurrence patterns, menopausal status, and exploratory survival outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 757 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy between 2002 and 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence patterns, and exploratory survival outcomes were evaluated according to peritoneal cytology status within postoperative recurrence risk groups.

resultsPPC was observed in 29.9% of patients, including 20.0% of the low-risk group. PPC was associated with adverse pathological features, including advanced stage, lymphovascular space invasion, deep myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, and adnexal involvement. PPC was more frequent among premenopausal patients. However, among patients with PPC, menopausal status was not associated with progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). PPC was associated with peritoneal recurrence in the overall cohort (9.3% vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001), with a trend in the low-risk group (P = 0.057). In exploratory multivariable analyses, PPC was associated with shorter PFS in the low-risk group (P = 0.009) but not with OS.

conclusionPPC was observed across all postoperative recurrence risk groups, including low-risk disease, and was associated with adverse clinicopathological features and peritoneal recurrence. The higher frequency of PPC in premenopausal patients, despite no association between menopausal status and prognosis among cytology-positive patients, suggests heterogeneity in the mechanisms underlying cytological positivity. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective validation.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneumAdultAgedFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEndometrial cancerExploratory analysisMenopausal statusPeritoneal cytologyPeritoneal recurrenceRecurrence risk classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.