Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42417897›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2026

Tissue donation in forensic cases: a retrospective study from Sweden.

Kajsa Kepplerus, Malin Pauli, Astrid Ohlin Åstrand, Jesper Greby, Ali-Reza Rezaie, Kristoffer Björkstrand, Brita Zilg, Nina Heldring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kajsa KepplerusDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Sölvegatan 25, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Malin PauliDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Alfred Nobels Allé 41, 141 52, Stockholm, Sweden.
Astrid Ohlin ÅstrandDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Blombäcks väg 5, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jesper GrebyDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Sölvegatan 25, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.
Ali-Reza RezaieDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Blombäcks väg 5, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristoffer BjörkstrandDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Blombäcks väg 5, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Brita ZilgDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Blombäcks väg 5, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nina HeldringDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Blombäcks väg 5, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden. nina.heldring@rmv.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9881-8182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of a loved one under traumatic circumstances is challenging and often requires families to make difficult decisions. Forensic autopsy cases frequently involve sudden or traumatic deaths but do not preclude tissue donation or contact with next-of-kin. Many deceased individuals in these contexts are young and medically suitable for donation, making it important to understand when such donations are feasible to ultimately expand the pool of available tissues. This study investigates how next-of-kin interpret the deceased's presumed donation wishes based on manner of death, age, and sex. Using registry data from the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, we analyzed demographics and consent outcomes was used to assess factors associated with next-of-kin consent. Of 1159 donation assessments, 691 cases involved next-of-kin contact. In cases without prior official donor declaration (556 individuals), consent was about twice as likely after natural death compared with accidents (OR 2.42) or suicide (OR 1.73). Among children aged 0-17, next-of-kin were markedly more likely to interpret boys' wishes as positive compared with girls (OR 7.59), while no sex differences were seen in adults. These findings show that tissue donation remains feasible in forensic cases and that both manner of death and age shape family interpretations, underscoring the need for tailored communication.

Indexed as

Forensic MedicineTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFamilyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesConsentDonation feasibilityDonation registryManner of deathTissue and organ procurement

Identifiers

PMID42417897
PMCPMC13346273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.