ArticleCell and tissue banking2026
Tissue donation in forensic cases: a retrospective study from Sweden.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loss of a loved one under traumatic circumstances is challenging and often requires families to make difficult decisions. Forensic autopsy cases frequently involve sudden or traumatic deaths but do not preclude tissue donation or contact with next-of-kin. Many deceased individuals in these contexts are young and medically suitable for donation, making it important to understand when such donations are feasible to ultimately expand the pool of available tissues. This study investigates how next-of-kin interpret the deceased's presumed donation wishes based on manner of death, age, and sex. Using registry data from the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, we analyzed demographics and consent outcomes was used to assess factors associated with next-of-kin consent. Of 1159 donation assessments, 691 cases involved next-of-kin contact. In cases without prior official donor declaration (556 individuals), consent was about twice as likely after natural death compared with accidents (OR 2.42) or suicide (OR 1.73). Among children aged 0-17, next-of-kin were markedly more likely to interpret boys' wishes as positive compared with girls (OR 7.59), while no sex differences were seen in adults. These findings show that tissue donation remains feasible in forensic cases and that both manner of death and age shape family interpretations, underscoring the need for tailored communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.