ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Ergonomic impact of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton on surgeon workload during laparoscopic tasks: a crossover experimental study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive surgery, particularly laparoscopic surgery, places considerable musculoskeletal strain on surgeons and is associated with high rates of pain, fatigue, numbness, and stiffness. Wearable assistive devices such as exoskeletons have been proposed as ergonomic solutions; however, evidence supporting their effectiveness in laparoscopic surgery remains limited. This study evaluated the feasibility and ergonomic impact of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton during laparoscopic procedures.
methodsThis prospective crossover study used 28 porcine models. Twenty surgeons with varying laparoscopic experience each performed two laparoscopic intracorporeal gastrointestinal anastomoses, with and without a passive upper-limb exoskeleton. Surgeons were randomly assigned to begin either with the exoskeleton or without it. The primary outcome was total workload assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), calculated as the mean of the six domains. Secondary outcomes included individual NASA-TLX domain scores and anastomosis time. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to laparoscopic experience (beginner, intermediate, expert) and anastomosis type (stapled vs. handsewn).
resultsNo significant difference was observed between the exoskeleton and non-exoskeleton conditions for the primary outcome, the mean total NASA-TLX score. Among the secondary outcomes, the NASA-TLX domains Physical Demand and Effort were significantly lower with the exoskeleton than without it (72.5 [48.8-81.3] vs. 45.0 [25.0-67.5], p = 0.026; 65.0 [40.0-76.3] vs. 37.5 [30.0-70.0], p = 0.025). No significant differences were observed in the other NASA-TLX domains or in anastomosis time. In subgroup analyses, workload was significantly lower with the exoskeleton among expert surgeons (p = 0.036) and during hand-sewn anastomosis (p = 0.009).
conclusionsThe exoskeleton did not significantly reduce overall workload. However, it decreased the NASA-TLX domains Physical Demand and Effort during laparoscopic procedures without compromising procedural performance. The reduction in workload appeared more pronounced among expert surgeons and during hand-sewn anastomosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42417827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.