ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2026
Emergence of difficult-to-treat lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis? Analysis based on three cases with high and low MIC Sporothrix brasiliensis isolates.
Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sporotrichosis, caused by a Sporothrix schenckii complex species, is historically viewed as an easily manageable mycosis. However, the current zoonotic epidemic in Brazil due to the more virulent Sporothrix brasiliensis poses some challenges. We describe three cases of lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis (LC) in non-immunocompromised patients, which proved refractory to standard treatment, and suggest that closer epidemic surveillance would be advisable to detect whether more difficult-to-treat cases are --emerging. All cases required prolonged treatment, escalating doses, and therapeutic changes for resolution. Patients' isolates were molecularly identified as S. brasiliensis. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) revealed high itraconazole MICs in two of the three isolates. Management required high-dose itraconazole (400 mg/day) in two cases and Amphotericin B in one. These cases challenge the perception of sporotrichosis as an always easily treatable disease. The difficulties observed may be linked to the increased S. brasiliensis virulence, the emergence of drug-resistant strains, and/or the rise in severe and atypical presentations. Lack of standardized protocols for refractory cases complicates effective management. These findings underscore the urgent need for enhanced epidemiological surveillance, efforts to isolate and perform AST on clinical strains, and standardization of treatment guidelines for patients failing initial therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.