ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026
[Distribution of Dental Specialty Centers across health regions in Brazil, 2023].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the distribution of Dental Specialty Centers (CEOs, acronym in Portuguese) across Brazilian health regions and to identify contextual factors associated with this distribution. This ecological cross-sectional study used secondary data from 1,214 active CEOs in December 2023, extracted from the Brazilian National Registry of Health Establishments. The hurdle negative binomial model was applied to identify factors associated with the distribution of these services, considering demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, as well as the availability of oral health teams in primary care. The results showed that 82.44% of Brazil's health regions have at least one CEO. The Northeast stood out, with 93.23% of its health regions housing CEOs, exceeding proportions observed in other regions. The social vulnerability index was associated with both the presence and the number of CEOs, showing paradoxical effects. Regions with higher vulnerability were less likely to have a CEO (OR = 0.905; 95%CI: 0.871-0.940), but among regions with at least one CEO, higher vulnerability was associated with an increased number of these services (RR = 1.023; 95%CI: 1.013-1.033). Although CEOs are predominantly implemented in less vulnerable regions, compensatory strategies appear to be emerging to ensure service availability in more vulnerable areas, consistent with the inverse equity hypothesis. However, significant challenges remain regarding Brazil's territorial dimension, gaps in service coverage, and the need to optimize the use of CEOs. Although secondary oral healthcare must be considered within a regionalized context, the unequal distribution of health regions across states and geographic regions, variation in territorial area, and mobility constraints may affect access to CEOs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.