ArticleChemical senses2026
Hierarchies of smell: structuring the molecular odor space using semantic taxonomies and machine learning.
Article in Chemical senses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the key challenges to predict odor from the molecular structure is unarguably our limited understanding of the odor space and the complexity of the underlying structure-odor relationships. Here, we introduce an expert-curated taxonomy (ET) that captures the hierarchical relations between odor descriptors for molecular datasets. To quantify the usefulness and relevance of this expert taxonomy, we provide a systematic validation that leverages the predictive performance of machine learning models for structure-based odor predictions, as well as known structure-odor relationships. As a control next to the ET based on semantic and perceptual similarities, we provide a data-driven taxonomy (DT) based on clustering co-occurrence patterns of odor descriptors from our expert-curated molecular dataset. The latter is derived from available datasets in the Pyrfume repository. Both taxonomies (ET and DT) add value in the semantic organization of odor descriptors and provide an avenue for novel insights in molecular structure-odor prediction. Together with in-depth validation steps that highlight the value of odor taxonomies, the quality of the ET is quantitatively assessed. The DT further allows critical evaluation of the expert taxonomy, identification of potential inconsistencies, and a better understanding of the molecular odor space. Finally, we highlight the results of the expert-curated taxonomy by showcasing odor predictions for the case of pear odorants used in perfumery. Both taxonomies as well as a full molecular dataset are made available to the community, providing a stepping stone for a future community-driven exploration of the molecular basis of smell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.