ArticleResearch in nursing & health2026
The Adherence Paradox in Uncontrolled Moderate-To-Severe Asthma: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Unmet Needs.
Article in Research in nursing & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Adherence Paradox in Uncontrolled Moderate-To-Severe Asthma: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Unmet Needs.Research in nursing & health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In clinical practice, a significant subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma reports persistent symptoms and substantial impairment in daily functioning despite high adherence to prescribed inhaled therapy. However, their lived experiences and unmet needs remain poorly understood. This descriptive phenomenological study aimed to explore the illness experiences, related barriers, and unmet needs of adults with moderate-to-severe asthma who remained persistently uncontrolled despite objectively verified high adherence to prescribed inhaled maintenance therapy. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 adult patients between June and November 2025 in a specialty asthma clinic at a tertiary-level hospital in China, and the data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological method. Four overarching themes were identified, revealing a multidimensional hidden burden: (1) physiological instability, characterized by persistent symptoms and comorbidity-driven symptom amplification; (2) life-space constriction, involving occupational vulnerability, stigma, and defensive withdrawal; (3) psychological duality, in which fear and vigilance coexisted with resigned habituation; and (4) therapeutic dilemmas, including corticosteroid anxiety and dependence, financial toxicity, and fears of therapeutic futility. These findings show that persistent poor control in highly adherent patients is experienced not simply as ongoing symptoms, but as a multidimensional burden. This adherence paradox challenges the assumption that high adherence invariably indicates satisfactory control. The findings also highlight the need for nurse-led follow-up and future intervention studies focusing on symptom interpretation, uncertainty management, and treatment-related concerns in this subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.