ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Exploring the roles of informal healthcare providers in urban settings to improve access and quality of care for the urban poor: experience from Bangladesh, Ghana, Nepal, and Nigeria.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Though informal healthcare providers (IHPs), often defined as unregistered and not formally trained, are heavily utilized by low-income urban residents and present an opportunity to address the urban primary care gap, these providers are rarely prioritized or integrated into health systems. This paper explores IHPs' role in urban settings across four rapidly urbanizing low- and middle-income countries: Bangladesh, Nepal, Nigeria, and Ghana, to enhance understanding of their potential within health systems and promote their integration to improve access and quality of care for the urban poor. We studied published and unpublished articles and policy documents to compare informal provider types, roles, services, and target populations in each country. We then present case studies illustrating how these providers support healthcare for urban poor. A narrative synthesis was applied to describe the included documents/literature and results, while quantitative data were analysed using STATA version 16. OpenStreetMap basemaps were employed to illustrate informal providers' locations within urban areas. Our findings show that across the four countries, there is substantial evidence that informal providers contribute significantly to health service delivery by bridging the care gap, particularly for socially and economically disadvantaged urban populations. They serve as the first point of contact, offering a wide range of health services, including preventive, curative, and restorative services. However, they are loosely defined and lack robust standards, protocols, professional training, and accreditation. Informal providers play a critical, though varied, role in the delivery of healthcare across the countries studied, facilitating access to care where it might otherwise be unavailable or unaffordable. Initiatives to strengthen the informal sector, e.g. linking or integrating with the formal sector, have the potential to improve healthcare access and quality for the urban poor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.