ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Phylogenomics confirm the monophyly of Guzmania (Bromeliaceae: Tillandsioideae) and provide evidence regarding alternative hybridization scenarios involving G. monostachia.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
premiseWe present a phylogenomic framework to clarify the evolutionary origin of Guzmania within the broader Tillandsioideae. The genus represents ~15% of extant diversity in Tillandsioideae and includes the widespread G. monostachia, whose distribution spans northern South America, Central America, the Caribbean, and southern Florida. Populations of G. monostachia have been in decline recently due to habitat loss and fragmentation, with Florida populations-its northernmost limit of the species-particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic threats. Understanding the evolutionary history of these lineages is essential for assessing their genetic diversity and guiding conservation efforts.
methodsWe assembled new plastid and nuclear genome references for G. monostachia to construct novel plastome and nuclear single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data sets. We integrated these data sets with public sequence data to infer phylogenomic relationships and estimate divergence times across Tillandsioideae. We also performed per-site log-likelihood analyses to visualize phylogenetic signal across two discordant topologies for G. monostachia.
resultsWe recovered a monophyletic Guzmania, but many relationships within Tillandsioideae remain unresolved. Notably, phylogenetic analyses revealed conflicting signals about the monophyly of G. monostachia, with some trees placing G. fuerstenbergiana and G. remyi nested within it.
conclusionsOur findings underscore the limitations of large-scale plastid data for clarifying Tillandsioideae phylogenies. Nonetheless, they suggest a possible hybrid origin for G. monostachia and a distinct evolutionary trajectory for Florida populations. Data and insights generated by our study provide a foundation to enable forthcoming genetic diversity studies and future conservation planning for this threatened lineage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.