ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Shared clinical decision-making for vaccination: A view through the lens of mid-adult HPV vaccination.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the summer of 2019, the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) updated its recommendations for HPV vaccination. The new recommendation regarding adults ages 27-45y (i.e., mid-adults) indicated that a "shared clinical decision-making" (SCDM) approach, rather than a routine recommendation, should be used. The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) publication that described this SCDM recommendation included specific conditional guidance and considerations for SCDM. However, some aspects of the guidance are vague, and others are inconsistent with SCDM, which could lead to confusion for adult health care providers and ultimately lead to under-vaccination of eligible individuals who would benefit from HPV vaccination. More recently, in the U.S. there have been policy proposals to shift additional vaccine recommendations from routine to SCDM. In this commentary, we briefly outline the ACIP recommendations, provide a clear overview of SCDM, and then offer potential implementation challenges for this guideline. For both unvaccinated adult patients and the providers who serve them, clear guidance on effective SCDM practices for HPV vaccination is an essential component for addressing the prevention of HPV-related disease. Using the context of mid-adult HPV vaccination, we also discuss the implications of SCDM recommendations for other vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.