Observational studyCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2026
Clinical Triage of Individuals With Warning Symptoms of Imminent Cardiac Arrest.
Observational study in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAt least 50% of individuals who suffer sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) have warning symptoms before their SCA, but these are not sufficient to predict imminent SCA (ISCA). We hypothesized that combining symptoms with clinical profile could effectively predict ISCA.
methodsIn 2 community-based studies of SCA in Oregon and California, survivors of SCA who had experienced warning symptoms and called 911 (n=364) were compared with control subjects (n=313) who also called 911 for similar symptoms but did not have SCA. Symptom information was obtained directly from interviews as well as prehospital emergency records. We used machine learning to identify predictive combinations of symptoms and clinical features in this case-control study. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 5-fold cross-validation were used to assess model performance and stability.
resultsWarning symptom-clinical profile combinations were successfully identified. The combination of chest pain and known heart failure predicted ISCA among men, while chest pain and known coronary artery disease predicted ISCA among women (AUC=0.788). With dyspnea, both history of coronary artery disease and heart failure were predictors (AUC=0.745). In the absence of chest pain or dyspnea, seizure-like symptoms, coronary artery disease, and heart failure were predictors (AUC, 0.775). 5-fold cross-validation produced consistent results.
conclusionsCombinations of warning symptoms and clinical features distinguished individuals with SCA from individuals without SCA with good accuracy (AUCs, 0.745-0.788). These findings have implications for clinical triage of ISCA warning symptoms in emergency settings and warrant investigation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.