ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2026
[La version française de la liste de vérification CRISP : un outil pratique pour la publication de la recherche en soins primaires en français].
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The French version of the CRISP checklist: A practical tool for publishing primary care research in French. This editorial introduces the French version of the Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) checklist, a reporting tool developed to improve the quality, relevance, and transparency of primary care publications. It notes that primary care research has unique methods, populations, and health system contexts, and thus needs tailored reporting guidance. The article describes the checklist's development via international consensus and its flexibility for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. The checklist assists authors, reviewers, editors, teachers, and study planners. The editorial stresses the importance of a French version, given French's global presence, especially in Africa, while English dominates scientific publishing. This language barrier hinders French-speaking researchers. Offering a French version improves access and supports clearer communication of research in Francophone and African settings. The editorial concludes that the French CRISP checklist strengthens reporting and helps to interpret and apply primary care research findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.