ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026
The Role of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Stratifying Management of Older Adults with Acute Calculous Cholecystitis and Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) and acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP) are common gallstone-related emergencies in older adults. Current guidelines emphasize early control of the acute event and definitive management when feasible, but their applicability in the older population is constrained by marked heterogeneity in physiological reserve that chronological age alone fails to capture. This narrative review examines the role of frailty in clinical decision-making for older adults with ACC and AGP, organized around two intersecting questions that recur at admission: how severe is the current acute event, and how depleted is the patient's baseline reserve. The review outlines frailty assessment tools commonly used in emergency settings and focuses on the bedside utility of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) as a practical means of operationalizing the baseline-reserve question. Drawing on existing guidelines and observational evidence, we summarize how management considerations shift according to baseline reserve: patients with substantially preserved reserve generally remain candidates for standard pathways; those with borderline reserve may require bridging and iterative reassessment; and those with substantial dependency or limited recovery potential require explicit goals-of-care discussion before further invasive management is pursued. The organizing perspective and stratification presented here are intended to support clinical judgment and risk communication rather than to serve as a validated algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.